The cost of winning the Eurovision Song Contest

We’re now NatWest Group

Come and visit us for all our latest news, insights and everything NatWest Group.


The cost of winning the Eurovision Song Contest

The odds of the UK winning tonight’s Eurovision Song Contest are slim at 25/1 but for the eventual winners it can become a costly prize. NatWest Chief Economist Stephen Boyle takes a look at the cost of hosting the event.

Blog Author Image
Stephen Boyle
NatWest Chief Economist
Blog Economic Analysis

13 May 2016

Eurovision Song Contest 2015 banner

What else could the money buy?

 

The Eurovision Song Contest is a costly endeavour. With countries like Azerbaijan spending £48m on hosting the event and with the IMF persuading Hungary to withdraw in 2010 due to the cost, the financials of hosting can’t be overestimated. Ahead of tonight’s competition, I’ve attempted to work out the real economic value of winning and hosting the Eurovision song contest.

SVT, Sweden’s national broadcaster has set aside a budget of £11 million for this year’s show.  What else could that money have got the broadcaster?

In the entertainment world, £11 million buys:

  • Three and a half episodes of BBC’s The Night Manager
  • One Premier League match, under the contract that comes into effect next season
  • Two series of Strictly Come Dancing
  • Three episodes of The X Factor
  • Five years worth of the Great British Bake Off
  • 3.7 million copies of Abba’s Waterloo on vinyl

Other popular buys would be:

  • 409,000 Big Macs                                                             
  • 38 average UK houses
  • 670 Ford Focus cars                                                        
  • 24,000 iPhone 6
  • 122,000 nights at a Premier Inn                 
  • 0.1% of the London Olympics
  • 95 feet of Crossrail                                                         
  • Quarter of a mile of HS2
  • One year at university for 460 students
  • The pay of 380 nurses
  • The remainder of Jamie Vardy’s contract with Leicester City

So why do cities splash the cash on Eurovision?

Firstly Eurovision tourism is big business. Like other major events, the ESC attracts visitors and publicity for the host city and country. The last time Sweden hosted the competition in Malmo the £17m they spent was practically offset by the £16m made in tourism spending from just over 32,000 tourists. 2014 host city Copenhagen estimated they generated over £13m from the ESC with over 39,000 visitors who created over 87,000 overnight stays for local hoteliers. 

All this tourism creates jobs. In 2012 Baku in Azerbaijan spent a total of £48m hosting the contest. The high cost can be partly attributed to the Baku Crystal Hall which was built specifically to host Eurovision. The construction of the Hall contributed to the creation of over 500 full time jobs – a welcome boost for a country that was less appealing to traditional Eurovision tourists. Last year’s host Vienna created the equivalent of 416 jobs in the hotel and restaurant sectors as well as in the arts, broadcasting, advertising and market research.

So – is it worth it?

It’s hard to be conclusive. Every host city has seen a modest boost in both short-term tourism and in their local economy. The longer-term benefits are harder to estimate but with over 180 million viewers worldwide, the international, positive exposure that comes as part of hosting is likely to dramatically increase tourism related revenue. Plus, there’s the kudos of winning, and in some eyes, that’s just as important. 

Economic impacts of Eurovision on recent host cities

Year

Host city

Cost, £m

Full-time equivalent jobs created

Tourist visitors

Tourism spending, £m

Reference

2015

Vienna, Austria

28

416

30,000

22

escbubble.com

oikotimes.com

2014

Copenhagen, Denmark

36

139

39,000

13

visitcopenhagen.dk

eurovisionworld.com

2013

Malmo, Sweden

17

130

32,000

16

malmotown.com

2012

Baku, Azerbaijan

48

529

 

7

tourism.edu.az

Related articles

House prices up 20,000% since Bank of England nationalised

RBS Chief Economist Stephen Boyle looks back at what has happened to the British economy since the Bank of England was nationalised 70 years ago.

Royal Bank of Scotland and NatWest raise awareness of romance scams

Typical victim of romance scams is over 50 and usually male. RBS is raising awareness to help victims avoid losing money due to these scams.

Latest news

RBS to help 2.5 million people each year to be more financially capable

RBS has today committed to helping 2.5 million people in the UK each year to improve their financial capability.

RBS to increase lending to sustainable energy sector following £1.1bn securitisation of loans to UK sustainable energy market

RBS has executed a £1.1bn securitisation deal with Macquarie Infrastructure Debt Investment Solutions (MIDIS), which will allow the bank to recycle capital and increase lending to the sustainable or renewable energy sectors.

RBS launches £1 billion Female Entrepreneurship Funding and announces targets to help create at least 50k new businesses by 2023

RBS has today announced a new £1 billion in funding through NatWest to support female entrepreneurs in the UK to scale and grow – the largest intervention by a UK lender focused specifically on female-led businesses.

We’re now NatWest Group

Come and visit us for all our latest news, insights and everything NatWest Group.

Set Tab for lightbox